Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
What does it take to be a efficient leader ? The claim perorates between a higly competitive character and a more conciliating one. Although looking aggresively for results is valuable for chiefs, most successes rely on people teamworking and cooperating rather than one person viing for harsh competition.
Traditionally, leaders are held as utmost figures at every scale of society : citizens listen to the President, players to their team leader, employees to their bosses. Indeed, leaders have - or at least think to have - assertive behavior that enable to achieve the goals. The CEO of a company decides everyday how to make his or her company more profitable. And profit comes from better products than the competitors, better design, better supply chains. However such improvements for profitability can be made at the expenses of the employees, thus creating resentment. Eventually the CEO would fail because he or she cannot produce without willing employees.
Conversely, cooperation is the more pragmatic way to progress together, without leaving anyone on the sideway. Taking many options into account and seeking compromises often lead to better results. For example, if the Parlament passes law on which any citizen or their direct representatives had any word to say, then it is highly likely citizens will criticize the law. Whereas if the Governement talked with trade unions if the law concerns work, or NGO and associations if it is cultural or social related, the politicians could better assess the needs and tailor the law to answer the actual demands.
Nevertheless, I acknowledge that looking for consensus is a tedious journey and may sometimes be counter-productive. Indeed, if too many parts are joining the discussion, filibusters can hinder the progress of the law-making, only because they do not agree on minor parts of the text for instance. Hence, cooperation without a convincing and assertive leader is of little use if we want to complete projects.
In conclusion, cooperation should be looked for in every projects but competitive leaders are also necessary because they take decisions
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
What does it take to be a efficient leader ? The claim perorates ...
^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...the goals. The CEO of a company decides everyday how to make his or her company more pro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s, better design, better supply chains. However such improvements for profitability can...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, then, thus, whereas, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36417910448 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04934002766 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64776119403 0.4932671777 131% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8228875587 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.705882353 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 5.21951772744 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15237610957 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475424683962 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469544736117 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896648022768 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341530083827 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.