Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
The field of study chosen by the student often pave the way for his future life as entrepreneur, academician, engineer, but all more, grounds his bases as individual. Therefore, to blissfully burgeon as worker and citizen, one should heed his interests and talents; the consequences of which might extend to gains at a wide-scale.
To recount from the statement, it is crucial to note that the marketplace most often regulates itself alone. Both students, and the availability of jobs cater to each other needs; and there is no country where many jobs within finance abound, for instance, while too much students graduated in literature. The high unemployment rate of certain countries have its genesis in myopic decisions of ruling parties, or wrong international policies. However, as happened in India during its years of intense development, ramifications antithetical to the ones expected might erect. The government through educational institutions had indeed enticed students to undertake engineering studies, which curbed the demand in the field due to the plethora of mechanical and computer sciences engineers. Nowadays, it results in a brain drain towards the United States or France.
Our societies evolve as fast as new technologies are developed, and so do the job-market. AI was hardly sought-after twenty years ago, and the marketing through influencers might use up in five years. These instances embody the fact that the trends of the job market are sometimes imponderable for the laity, and only basing one's choice on the availability of jobs in a field might leave students with nothing but outdated skills. Moreover, financial crises are telltale that even the most flourishing fields are exposed to severe reshuffles. Thousands of bank workers were fired by Leman Brothers in 2008, despite this sector had been touted as one with high jobs' availability. Focusing on one's talents when choosing the field of study might also act as bulwark against depression and suicide over such vicissitudes.
Admittedly, there is no reason for students not to take into consideration the demand on the job-market when opting for a sub-field rather than another. If there is a predicted boom within electric mechanics, one might orientate his choice of major towards this area, instead of fossil engineering. However, the first ground of the decision should remain passion, which has always driven people into doing wonders. Examples from great scholars to maverick entrepreneurs corroborate on the fact that only if a persona is keenly interested in his field of study and work, will he reach his zenith.
The first part of the statement however awkwardly implies that the most theoretical subjects should be ignored. We would then be living in a soulless society in which the arts and philosophy are sacrificed on the altar of more pragmatical areas. Even intangible benefits might flow from studying a field we are interested in; the overall well-being of a nation, since its citizens daily work in fields that suit them. People would be focused on improving their work, and be less inclined to complain about it. Scant amount of violence might be the pinnacle of the potential positive consequences of this exposure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...finance abound, for instance, while too much students graduated in literature. The h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...nderable for the laity, and only basing ones choice on the availability of jobs in a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2721.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 518.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2528957529 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87361486256 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 313.0 215.323595506 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604247104247 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 841.5 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2520332875 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.304347826 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5217391304 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271677230845 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631216404106 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614987549551 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143009745222 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374345884524 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 159.0 100.480337079 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.