Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Every corporation should operate on the principle of equivalent exchange, i.e. if you reap benefits from the society and the environment you should care for them as well. The prompt states that some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate, I somewhat agree with that for the following three reasons.
A paper mill which mows down millions of trees will do irreparable damage to the environment around it unless it takes care of the environment is operating in. Trees are the lungs of the earth and help in regulating the oxygen level of the atmosphere as well as maintaining the monsoon cycle. Any corporation that damages the environment for its own profit must help in restoring in simultaneously. For example, a paper mill may plant a tree for each one it cuts down. This will ensure that the balance is maintained in the long run.
A corporation should focus on generating jobs for the society they operate in. They can easily hire cheap labour from other countries or move production to places with cheap labour but doing so would not help in improving the social image of the company nor the economy of the society. Generating jobs will improve the economic status of the society. Many studies have proven that economic stability is strongly linked to the well being of individuals, a happy and healthy society will also be better employees and consumers of the products that the corporation creates.
Corporations with wealth and power should use them to eradicate the plagues that infest society. For example corporations like Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation perform an admirable job to eradicate various diseases and poverty from many backwards areas of the world. Many third world countries still don't have access to clean water, food and shelter. These are the basic necessities to sustain life and corporations should share the wealth and resources with the society to make this world a better place.
Some may argue that these responsibilities are not what a corporation should deal with and that a corporation should be for profit only. I somewhat agree with this, thumb rule of capitalism is that the revenue generated eventually is for the greater good. It grows the market and uplifts the general economic status of everyone. However, this should not be used as an excuse by the corporations to ignore all moral responsibilities for the well being of the society or environment. Every corporation must operate on the principle of equivalent exchange.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding environment'?
Suggestion: the surrounding environment
... of trees will do irreparable damage to the environment around it unless it takes care of the environment...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 302, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...world. Many third world countries still dont have access to clean water, food and sh...
^^^^
Line 13, column 367, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... water, food and shelter. These are the basic necessities to sustain life and corporations should...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...his world a better place. Some may argue that these responsibilities are not wha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, third, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10117647059 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83034080382 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505882352941 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8731867153 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284213026775 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822978521575 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107766223124 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169202051085 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117889892179 0.0667264976115 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.