Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.
Do government officials must carry out different task as per the will of the people they serve.or they should base their decisions on their own judgement? I strongly support the later assertion than the previous. The reason behind this is that supporting the will of the people only while carrying out their duties make them dull and they will definitely lose their prestige in front of general people as they lack decision making power regarding their different official activities.
The fundamental reason why I support the later the later assertion is that strong decision making power helps indulge different versatile qualities inside the government officials. As a result, their image within the people will get escalated. For instance, in Nepal Electricity Board, before the period of former Electricity head, the condition of electricity department of Nepal is quite disastrous and has to face numerous economic debt. Similarly, Nepal had faced sixteen hours load shedding which dwindle our economic status. However, after the enrollment of new CEO Kulman Gishing, the problem of severe load shedding is now finished. It is so because of the active judgement and better vision of our new CEO that the problem related to power cut is now not existed inside our country. Therefore, effective judgement and foretelling vision definitely pave the path of extreme success.
The second reason why I chose the later assertion is that only carrying out the will of people while performing different governmental induce the feeling of partiality among people. As a result, the image of that department as well as of an individual person will get worsened. Moreover, serving people extremely may also deter the quality of work in governmental sector which definitely helps for private sectors to boost their image. Hence, general people will then believe in the work of private sector rather than believing on the work of government. For instance, the same case can be seen in Nepal after the over thrown of Panchyat System from our country. Due to these reasons, many large industries of our country got closed because of less friendly and visionary policy. Such affairs give support to the private sectors to increase their activeness all across the nation. Therefore, government officials should use their caliber and strong determination to forecast different tasks.
Some may argue that government officials should work as per the will of the people. Carrying out different tasks in public level by government, government officials should work according to the accord of the people. On doing so, the failure of developing noble business and different infrastructural activities will not be doomed up. For instance, about one year ago, due to the strong support from the general public, the new pipe line work of Birgunj Amlekhgunj had been accomplished. Thus, to carry our different new plans and activities, proper approval and support from the local dwellers is needed in spite of carrying out work individually. However, this point is flawed since only taking the will of people will never accomplished any noble tasks. Hence, to pursue any new projects, there must be strong determination and their have to be strong judgement from the different policy makers so as to validate the new projects.
To sum up, both government and people have to work side by side so that peace and prosperity can sustain inside the nation. Biasing the role of one, another can't bring and develop prosperity inside the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Do government officials must carry out different task as per the will...
^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the later the'. Did you mean 'later the'?
Suggestion: later the
... The fundamental reason why I support the later the later assertion is that strong decision...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the later'.
Suggestion: the later
... The fundamental reason why I support the later the later assertion is that strong decision makin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...extreme success. The second reason why I chose the later assertion is that only...
^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...to forecast different tasks. Some may argue that government officials should work a...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ago, due to the strong support from the general public, the new pipe line work of Birgunj Amle...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 898, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...gement from the different policy makers so as to validate the new projects. To sum up,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ation. Biasing the role of one, another cant bring and develop prosperity inside the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, as a result, as well as, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2953.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18980667838 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66521007638 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474516695958 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 918.9 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4874227028 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.37037037 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0740740741 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.62962962963 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362824629882 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093539003953 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129914608832 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207280421007 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167059774233 0.0667264976115 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.