Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
These days, politics plays a key role in every society and different political leaders choose various methods to lead the society. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among people whether their leaders always obey specific principles without considering their implications or decide based on situations. I personally, concur with the both opinions up to a point. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most important reasons.
To begin with, being committed to specific rules and principles causes trustful atmosphere in the society. if leaders obey rules in hardships and difficulties, people understand that they are trustful and loyal leaders. Therefore, every person in the society consider them as a role model and attempt to behave like them, as opposed to a situation when leader are not committed to principles, so people let themselves to behave in their desire, to the detriment of the whole society. This clearly demonstrates that leaders' commitment is necessary for society's discipline.
It is crystal clear that abandoning principles for the sake of society's safety is essential in some situations. In other word, changing behavior by leader based on circumstances is blessing in disguise and prevents chaos and disruption which is beneficial for society's success. For example, when a catastrophe such as falling an airplane that has many victims occurs in a society, leaders should prevent disruption by not giving the exact information about the number of victims or their fate or they should inform people later when they have managed crisis and the situation has become a little calm.
Last but not least, I think adopting policies should be based on situations. In one way, leaders should attract people's trust and tell them truths and committee themselves to obeying principles. In other way, their behavior should guarantee society's success which means that they should have some tricks to maintain society's calmness.
To sum up, leaders’ behavior has the most significant effect on a society and their policies are two-edged sword on the ground that people take them as a role model. if people understand that they disobey rules, they do not trust them anymore. On the other hand, if leaders do not conscious about some tricks to keep the society safe, the society will encounter with a great chaos. Hence, should leader decided based on situation, the society will maintain its unity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ses trustful atmosphere in the society. if leaders obey rules in hardships and dif...
^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...society. This clearly demonstrates that leaders commitment is necessary for societys di...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... that people take them as a role model. if people understand that they disobey rul...
^^
Line 17, column 474, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, the society will maintain its unity.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, for example, i think, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2915601023 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75573519021 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7782399688 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.944444444 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7222222222 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211925061574 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742011977889 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398686675161 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12613277528 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291458181536 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.