Some people claim that you can tell whether a nation is great by looking at the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists. Others argue that the surest indicator of a great nation is, in fact, the general welfare of all its people.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Although the main purpose of the government is to create a pleasant milieu for it's people, achievements that facilitate the well being is also a important yardstick to assess the greatness of a country.
Admittedly, the government's fundamental purpose is to enhance the overall living conditions of their nation. Relegating legislators that enforce laws that favor their hometowns or themselves is preposterous: they should represent the public's opinions and facilitate the society so that it is more favorable to the general public. Without prudent legislations, it would be difficult to call a nation developed. For instance, Finland is a developed nation in the sense that it has the greatest social welfare system created by the government and people's endeavor to create a society that is pleasant to all people. Without the happiness of the people, the nation as a whole can be assessed as lugubrious and incompetent.
Nevertheless, political success can be a category to appraise the nation's competence. Without renown politicians who can resolve political conflict or social problems, the country is unlikely to develop. To some extent, the nation's prosperity relies on the abilities of the leaders. North Korea is the opposing example: due to the faulty dictatorship, North Koreans are deprived of food and clothes and are very unhappy. Some even try running away from the government in a attempt to find new lives that would at least provide the basis of human rights. Consequently, the governor's aptness should not be overlooked when assessing a nations greatness.
Finally, either the well being of a nation or the achievements of the nation is sufficient to present the countries' success. For instance, the Soviet Union excelled in many disciplines by the funding of the government as a means of facilitating weapon development. However, their people suffered from destitute which cannot be seen as a healthy country. On the other hand, Brunay which is a country in the east-asia, is a prolific country due to the oil investments. Nevertheless, their educational status is derelict and no major breakthroughs in any field has been made. Even though they hold a high living standards, because of their lack of accomplishments, they are not recognized globally.
In conclusion, although the propitious environment should be a primary virtue to pursue when evaluating a country, the accomplishments should never be overlooked in the process. Both of these together constitute the success of a nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... that facilitate the well being is also a important yardstick to assess the great...
^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ety so that it is more favorable to the general public. Without prudent legislations, it would...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ccess can be a category to appraise the nations competence. Without renown politicians ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 225, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...nlikely to develop. To some extent, the nations prosperity relies on the abilities of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 472, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...try running away from the government in a attempt to find new lives that would at...
^
Line 9, column 573, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governors'' or 'governor's'?
Suggestion: governors'; governor's
...asis of human rights. Consequently, the governors aptness should not be overlooked when a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 633, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ould not be overlooked when assessing a nations greatness. Finally, either the wel...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...the nation is sufficient to present the countries success. For instance, the Soviet Union...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 610, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'standard'?
Suggestion: standard
...de. Even though they hold a high living standards, because of their lack of accomplishmen...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, well, at least, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34837092732 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13304059456 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53634085213 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5443452127 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.7 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.95 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176623999267 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534505691736 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046723026961 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952249545637 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410208718159 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.