Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The teaching become effective when it's two-way process. Teacher and students communicate with each other and exchange their ideas. During classroom teaching teachers are already talk but the students should also ask question related to topic to understand better. According to me the given statement is true and there are so many examples strengthen my position that students should ask relevant questions when teacher teaches in class.
Firstly, students are beginner in each class and the topic teaches is new for them. There is vast information in each topic and students can learn more if they ask questions. When a teacher enters in classroom and start teaching about a topic then she talks about whatever written in text books but if the students start asking more questions related to that topic then she will surely teach more than taught before. I had also experienced when I was in college, the professors took lecture according to syllabus but when we ask something out of our curiosity then he taught more than that. So, it will in favor of students when teacher provide deep knowledge about the topic.
Secondly, the students get benefit with asking questions during learning session on the same time teachers also feel satisfaction with such interaction. The teachers are full of knowledge and always ready to share with students, but if the students are passive and least interested in class then teacher also shorten the lecture or teaching time. My professor who taught me psychology at undergrad course he taught according to students’ responses and run a classroom program to motivate us for rising questions during lecture. I learnt notably in particular that lecture because of two-way communication in class.
Additionally, the learning will better when more than two sensory organs involved. In traditional classrooms we listen to teachers’ words and see the pictures but now it is changing and so many programs turn it towards experiential and interactive sessions. The students listen to words and look to images as well as ask questions after processing teaching stuff in mind made them experiential effect of learning. There are so many programs for life skills, stress management, become confident and all, mostly programs are interactive with audience. The speaker answers our question will fit in our mind and we follow it. As well as the students ask question then that particular thing stored for long time.
Hence, the aforementioned examples support my position in given issue statement. The students should always question to teacher or mentors instead of accepting it passively because the teacher did not get confusion of your mind without asking the questions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... related to topic to understand better. According to me the given statement is true and there a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause of two-way communication in class. Additionally, the learning will better w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, well, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2285.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24082568807 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7330933884 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490825688073 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.326795237 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.80952381 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7619047619 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90476190476 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139951786686 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497584124298 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376588743788 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995312218082 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361928122813 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.