There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Wildlife is a very important component of an ecosystem. Human beings are part of this and have to make sure that every other living organism thrives on this planet. The prompt says that the people are having doubts over making efforts to save endangered species with respect to the impact their actions have. In my opinion, I strongly agree for two reasons.
To begin with, hunting and poaching are some heinous around the world. Yet none of these are documented, or disseminated around the globe. Very recently, scores of rhinos were hunted down by the poachers in Western Africa, and the criminals are still at large. Hundreds of whales are still hunted down in the name of research only to be found rotting in the streets of Asian markets.Events like these might force an individual to question if one can really contribute to end this menace? Any aid that is being sent, is it being used to protect the wildlife and keep the poachers at bay or just gets neglected in the name of poverty, corruption ?
Further, many countries around the world are destroying their natural sancturies in the name of development. For instance, Brazil recently announced that it would resume mining operations in the Amazon even when hundreds of indigenous tribes opposed it. Amazon is one of the planet's most diverse ecological habitat and hosts upto 40% of the World's species. Canada announced to have an oil pipeline run right through it's forest cover. This might result in cleaning up thousands of trees. These examples illustrate, how government is trying to decimate the efforts made by people towards protection of flora and fauna. No matter how many protests or rallies are taken out, the government doesn't give an ear and continues with it's work. In such a situation, how can anyone be sure that their efforts would actually help in the betterment of the ecosystem?
One might argue that many international organisations are trying their best to preserve and conserve the environment. They can atmost delay the inevitable, but the decisions made by the government will nullify all the efforts made by them. In order to get the support of the public, one most make sure that their efforts, no matter how small they are, is considered in the big picture, which at the moment, isn't yet established.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | AtharvaKale | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-07 | Sumilak | 83 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | Siam | 66 | view |
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 58
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 54
- QUESTION Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ 76
- Claim Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s major field of study Reason Acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated Write a response in which you discu 50
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Wildlife is a very important component o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Events
...rotting in the streets of Asian markets.Events like these might force an individual to...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 688, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...r rallies are taken out, the government doesnt give an ear and continues with its work...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 409, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...n the big picture, which at the moment, isnt yet established.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, really, so, still, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91259640103 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58919009064 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586118251928 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4061932618 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.55 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.45 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0911394447836 0.243740707755 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.024677431151 0.0831039109588 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332876751053 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0593571793032 0.150359130593 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369903322109 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.