Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
No matter what we do or present, there will always be some amount of criticism towards it. But it doesn't always have to be a bad thing, it just depends on how we perceive it. Those who have an idea and are determined to implement it, can do so but there's no guarantee it will leave behind a legacy. This is subject to interpretation as it varies widely on the circumstances and most importantly, on the idea itself. Since doubts and criticism are inevitable, we should find ways to use it to our advantage to make our ideas a success.
Elon Musk is a prime example whose otherworldly ideas have gone on to prove people wrong. He's an innovator and an irrational thinker, not to mention a genius but his ability to see the future trends is what led him to create Tesla and Space X. Space X, soon after being commissioned almost went bankrupt. It's very existence depended on a successful launch and the odds were not in its favour. Had Musk been bogged down by the doubts and criticism towards the success of Space X, he could have dissolved it thinking that it was the most logical thing to do as NASA was on another level at this point. But, regardless of all this negativity surrounding him, he went ahead with the launch of his first rocket which ultimately was successful. That one eureka moment has made Space X what it is today. It by no means looks to be slowing down and is pretty much destined to leave a legacy behind.
But, this approach may not always reap success. Sometimes, it is necessary to hear what other people have to say and imagine things in their perspective. This can give us an insight into factors which we might have inadvertently missed. We can always use this introspection to further improve our ideas which may not have been possible otherwise. Although, we should look at such negativity with an open mind and not be dissuaded or devoid of hope by them. Therefore, ideas and goals can be a success if we turn the negatives to positives.
In conclusion, people should be subject to the interpretation of their ideas and use the doubts and criticism to self evaluate the validity of thier ideas and look at ways in which it can be further improved but never lose hope on the idea itself at the same time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... amount of criticism towards it. But it doesnt always have to be a bad thing, it just ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...termined to implement it, can do so but theres no guarantee it will leave behind a leg...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: He's
...eas have gone on to prove people wrong. Hes an innovator and an irrational thinker,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51105651106 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59635531428 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525798525799 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5423808471 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.35 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140221332348 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414319831028 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356181960258 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931238363505 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159565424482 0.0667264976115 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 12.1639044944 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.