Today it is clear that our increasing use of technology has caused more harm than good for mankind.
The years after 1995 has seen an unprecendented and exponential change in the lifestyle, culture and knowledge of the people. Almost all of this change can be attributed to the rise and improvement in technology and how it makes the world a smaller a place to live in. I mostly disagree with the claim that, technology today is hampering our human society. Some of the reasons are as follows.
Firstly, it is important to know, that we have successfully created a virtual close network of people that binds everyone together. Only a generation ago, most people waited in long lines near the telephone operator's window in their area for just one call. Today, we can see how the internet has brought people closer where our dear and loved ones are just a click of a button away. This interconnected network allows rapid spread of accurate information. For instance, one of the first Indian Nobel Prize winner, Ramanujan, left everything he had in India and travelled for 3 months on a ship to reach London to learn from the prestigious Cambridge University. His great work was known and studied by only few people who lived there. On the contrary, today we see his work easily available to us at the click of a button. Additionally, we see how people are learning at the comfort of their homes and still gaining the vast knowledge that the world has to offer. There is nothing that speaks of progress and development of the human society than the easy accessibility of information.
Speaking of learning from home, the presence of courses and online material from great institutions of the west allows students even from third world nations to learn, without much expenses on the infrastructure. All that they need is an internet connection and a handheld device. This allows us to give the opportunity to the people in these nations to see the light that the modern world shines in. For instance, the plea to release the girls and women held captive in Boko Haram were heard by the common people living in the six continents. And the world came together to fight for them.
Some might aver that technology causes young minds to be extremely dependent on machine intelligence and that leads man onto the path of devolution. However, we must realise how technology is allowing all children, regardless of their race, gender and disability to learn and grow. Ther are so many children found after the world war 2 era who have an IQ much higher than most smart scientists, like Einstein.
A world before the boon of technology was rotten by plaque, supression of the racially sexually different and people. Common people today have the liberty to voice out what they feel and have the power to bring change in the world. Technology has allowed us to generate universal societies and universal citizens who can take care of their brothers across the seven seas. We have finaly been able to achieve equality for all, and we cannot forget how technology has helped us achieve that. This all indicates how technology has done so much for us to improve the society not just for us, but also for the future citizens that will live in it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...y today is hampering our human society. Some of the reasons are as follows. Firstly, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...m third world nations to learn, without much expenses on the infrastructure. All tha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, third, as to, for instance, of course, speaking of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2596.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 543.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78084714549 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60945880522 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537753222836 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 818.1 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.168229814 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8461538462 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8846153846 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137339695165 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369051506555 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365273245262 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791161618987 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028852905985 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.