Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Leaders believes that undestandings from the past makes future better.
Leaders analyses the past data to make better decisions. Past data helps to list out the pros and cons of a situation and yields a better decision than coming to a decision without the understaning of the past. This approach of undestaning the past helps in better decision making for the leaders.
Often leaders came across same problems in various fields and everytime it doesnot make sense to spend same amount of time in analysing the situation since they are trying to solve the same problem which was already solved, so they prefer to understand the past solution to the same problem and if the same soultion works best to their current prolem then they will implement the same solution or modified soultion of the same problem.This often saves a lot of time.
Eventhough it is important to understand from the past it is necessary to decide whether to procced with past solution to existing problem or to find new solution to the exisitng problem. It's upto the leaders to decide what is best for the current situation and sometimes it is better to ignore past understanding if that understaing does not yield as expected and if it makes the problem more complex and messy to solve and go for a new approach to solve the current issue.
Some times a dynamic decison making appraoch is followed by some leaders and they are more successful than others but the probaility of that approach is very less among the current leaders.
Ultimately leaders prefers to understand from the past before coming to a conlusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...r modified soultion of the same problem.This often saves a lot of time. Eventhough...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 273.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86446886447 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56354782068 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483516483516 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 124.371109344 60.3974514979 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.555555556 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161426361212 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854040929271 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343256061142 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937093605955 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459998357517 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.