Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Humans are the greatest creatures of all known creations, and they have become that by learning, improvising, evaluating their past and correcting their mistakes. The statement asserts that understanding the past is not much useful to those who are current positions of leadership. I have to disagree with the author on that. Men can learn a lot of things from their past and use these knowledge to make better decisions in the future, and this also applies to the leaders currently in position of power.
humans are always curious, they are always trying to learn something, to achieve something. And if they fail to achieve their goals, they always try to find out what mistakes they made, so that they can correct them and get a step closer to their goals. They have achived so many things, and it was possible because they understood their past, and learnt from it. So, thinking that understanding one's past is of little use would be a grave mistake.
But, The authors statement has merit if interpreted in a different way. One might say that what good will it do to understand the past if this knowledge is of no use. and That is true, Just understanding the past will not be of much use, not for those in current position of leadership, not for anyone, if they don't learn from it, don't use the knowledge gained by evaluating the past. But that is not enough to justify the statement made by the author. It is the duty of a leader to make use of these knowledge and to make better decisions for his people. The characteristic of a great leader is, he is always trying to be a better leader for his people, he is always giving his best, always learing from his mistakes, mistakes made by his predecessors. History is a compulsory lesson for any great leader. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the greatest leader Bangladesh have ever seen, or Mahatma Gandhi, every great leader has become great by learnig from the past, and thus making a better future.
No one is impeccable, everyone makes mistakes, and understanding the past is the way to be able to make better choices, to be able to evade these mistakes. Even animal learns from their past. A study has shown that if a certain kind of behavior, or going to a certain place gets animals into trouble, they will always try to avoid that behavior or that path later on.
In conclusion, I'd say that understanding the past is of great use to a leader, to us, if we are willing to use that understandings, and trying to make ourselves better, and to make our future better. Developement of a country depends on a leader, a leader who understand the past, learns from the past mistakes, and tries to make himself better. Understanding the past is the only way to make the best use of the present, amd to make a better future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'these knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; these knowledges
...a lot of things from their past and use these knowledge to make better decisions in the future,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Humans
...ders currently in position of power. humans are always curious, they are always try...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...se would be a grave mistake. But, The authors statement has merit if interpreted in a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hors statement has merit if interpreted in a different way. One might say that what good will it d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...he past if this knowledge is of no use. and That is true, Just understanding the pa...
^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... of leadership, not for anyone, if they dont learn from it, dont use the knowledge g...
^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...for anyone, if they dont learn from it, dont use the knowledge gained by evaluating ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'these knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; these knowledges
... is the duty of a leader to make use of these knowledge and to make better decisions for his pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 16, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...or that path later on. In conclusion, Id say that understanding the past is of g...
^^
Line 11, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...past is of great use to a leader, to us, if we are willing to use that understand...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...present, amd to make a better future.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2297.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62173038229 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63035051874 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434607645875 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 710.1 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 14.0 1.77640449438 788% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3356000981 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.409090909 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5909090909 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.13636363636 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310028118695 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110896061809 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149872558635 0.0758088955206 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186906669553 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101964154801 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.