Universities should require every student to take a variety of course outside the student’s field of study.
Whether universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student field of study? The speaker maintains so. I concede that, in some situation, students educated with knowledge in several field are more competitive. But exceeding aspects of study are also harmful to students. Therefore, an all-side consideration is needed when deciding the precedence.
If students with strong curiosity are full of innovative ideas and would like to learn more about the world, there is no reason the universities do not offer them the opportunities of further-learning. Most students in colleges have not decide which area they will devote themselves to in the future, so future is full of indeterminacy for them. At this time, the universities, if possible, should try their best to make more kinds of courses accessible to students, therefore, students would have the chance to learn more, to experience more, so that they will have a better understanding of a lot field which helps them find what they really want.
However, not every student has the ability to learn whatever they want. Some of them are still suffering about their own field of study! What these students need is professional help of their own field. Otherwise they may be tired of study and finally give up. Therefore, if universities force these students to learn more than their field, the final result will be disappointing, since the students will be good at none field.
On the contrary, some students have the ability to learn more, but what their do want to learn is not in the university. Some students are planning to start their own business after graduation, instead of getting further education. For these students, a training of founding one's own company is better than any kinds of courses, since to develop an entrepreneurship is more crucial than knowing what is polymer crystal. Some of them even start to run a company while attending school, so them have little time to pick another field to study. Besides, how about the students who prefer learning from their self-reading or traveling around the world? There is no doubt that push them to the classroom is harmful to these students.
In sum, when deciding whether their students need other field of study, university should consider the situation and the plan of specific students. Otherwise, it will be just wasting of time and money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun field seems to be countable; consider using: 'several fields'.
Suggestion: several fields
...on, students educated with knowledge in several field are more competitive. But exceeding asp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'decided'.
Suggestion: decided
...ing. Most students in colleges have not decide which area they will devote themselves ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...s professional help of their own field. Otherwise they may be tired of study and finally ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, however, if, may, really, so, still, therefore, while, no doubt, of course, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05778894472 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77682299414 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505025125628 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.4864822542 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.65 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325532303099 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108945985459 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16611881835 0.0758088955206 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215666035527 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111914560276 0.0667264976115 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.