The way a message is delivered is often more important than the message itself.

Essay topics:

The way a message is delivered is often more important than the message itself.

In earlier times, the methodology of delivering message has meaning broader than the content of the message, that is, if one side respects other then they give this duty to their high level men in order to show their veneration and appreciation. The content of message aside, the receiver give more attention such details to check whether they are meticulous or presumptious. To some extent, these ceremonies are unnecessary so that they shadow the importance and vitality of the message, however, in my opion it is a way of showing their thoughtfulness, level of appreciation, hostility or hospitality, as a result I agree with the statement.

In fact,it is goo this statement is mainly referred to old times since nowadays, we have various technological alternatives to deliver a message immediately via mails, texts. If we think this in the concept of old soverignties, kingdoms, it cannot be denied that how you package something is more valuable and prominet that what this package constitutes. For instance, in Ottoman Empire, if they send gifts to show their appreciation, they would give high attention to its package and the deliverer, that is, they choose from their commanders who has high responsibility on the army, this is a signal to other side which means that he sacrifices his precious time just for this gift. This illustrates that when receiver observes that they do not consider about what the gift is and this is enough for their satisfaction and they pursues strong affairs or alliances. This illustrates political issues give high importance on attentiveness and aesthetic while they consider their political decisions.

Following this, there are instances in which societies choose to show their hatred or disregardness by the means of giving ironic gifts or sending their lower level employees. For instance, North Korea, has sent a gift to president of America a gift by an ordinary governmental employee to show their recklessness to American authority. This example also supports the claim that even Nort Korea has sent a friendly message, after their chosen method, it is not valid and genuine anymore as they have intended.

On the other hand, all these bureacracy aside, there may be urgent cases in which the sender could not have found time for focusing on such procedures, accordingly, receiver should place high importance on the content rather than aesthetic or burearacy. In war times, as we know, military messages are notably vital and should be sent immediately to take action on time. These messages are generally which seek for support, additional army, providing some necessary materials. To put it another way, they cannont waste time on these issues and we cannot denigrate their honor or appreciation if they choose a simple method since the only thing they desire to emphasize is its emergency and vitality.

In conclusion, both sides considered, in previous society the way of delivering message exceed the meaning although there are some exceptional cases, additionally, as examples show, they hold the meaning of honours, respect and veneration.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...broader than the content of the message, that is, if one side respects other then...
^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: OTHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'other than'?
Suggestion: other than
...message, that is, if one side respects other then they give this duty to their high level...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...e, that is, if one side respects other then they give this duty to their high level...
^^^^
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...t I agree with the statement. In fact,it is goo this statement is mainly referre...
^^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly referred to old times since nowadays, we have various technological alternativ...
^^
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther side which means that he sacrifices his precious time just for this gift. Th...
^^
Line 3, column 832, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'pursue'
Suggestion: pursue
... enough for their satisfaction and they pursues strong affairs or alliances. This illus...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntal employee to show their recklessness to American authority. This example also...
^^
Line 7, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which seek for support, additional army, providing some necessary materials. To p...
^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ides considered, in previous society the way of delivering message exceed the mea...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, if, may, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 33.0505617978 200% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2608.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20558882236 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8918952807 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518962075848 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 827.1 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7899644067 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.0 118.986275619 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3125 23.4991977007 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145822525018 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585276468185 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527649054271 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101850907531 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660412422767 0.0667264976115 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.1392134831 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 48.8420337079 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.8971910112 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.