We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
This topic raises a controversial issue of whether can we actually learn much more from people whose views are supported by us or from people whose views contradict
our own. Indisputably, we usually learn from people whose way of dealing with an issue is similar to our own. Nevertheless, we can't learn as much as from the people
who's views are supported by us than from whose views contradict from our own because it helps us to identify at which places there can be loopholes present in our
ideology which were condoned by us. Thus, I generally agree with the opinion that we can learn a lot more from people whose perceptions conflict with ours rather than
support.
First of all, both support and contradictions are necessary for understanding any new method or ideology to be implemented. Contradictions made against our current
method gives us knowledge of why and how such contradictions are engendering from which you can identify the some major flaws planted in that way of thinking.
After identifying such flaws there is a huge scope of either getting rid of them or improving them so that such contradictions wont repeat themselves. To illustrate let us
look have an example of Football Managing techniques of Jurgen Klopp who is currently manager of Liverpool Football team. In his last Premier league Season of
2107-2018 he felt that his football tactics were perfect and supported by most well-known people in the world of football. Yet, he would always welcome any contradictions
of criticisms about his football tactics and found out that his defense lacked because of which he was conceding more goals. As a result, he mined that flaw out and
adapted to it by buying a better defender in the next transfer window because of which he now stands at the top of his league.
Some would argue that, people whose views are compatible with ours can also give us deep and better understanding about that method or ideology. THis is not at all
true. How will you improve the world if everyone is on the same side? However, debating and not conforming to ideas can cause a degree of discomfort and ill-will
among the debaters but it will finally lead to better and more cogent ideas because any ideology or method cannot be developed without making mistakes which can only
be identified when open to any contradictions. Therefore, the above argument is indefensible.
In conclusion, although we can get better insights and improvements in our ideas from people who's views we share we can't tackle loopholes which we previously overlooked
in supporting any ideology, which can only be learned from the refutations made against our ideology. Hence, we can conclude that we can usually learn much more from
people whose views we support than from people whose views contradict from our own.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us or from people whose views contradict our own. Indisputably, we usually learn ...
^^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...is similar to our own. Nevertheless, we cant learn as much as from the people whos ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
... cant learn as much as from the people whos views are supported by us than from who...
^^^^
Line 8, column 110, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...ndering from which you can identify the some major flaws planted in that way of thin...
^^^^
Line 10, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...am. In his last Premier league Season of 2107-2018 he felt that his football tact...
^^^
Line 12, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... As a result, he mined that flaw out and adapted to it by buying a better defende...
^^^
Line 13, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he now stands at the top of his league. Some would argue that, people whose view...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t method or ideology. THis is not at all true. How will you improve the world if ...
^^^
Line 16, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause a degree of discomfort and ill-will among the debaters but it will finally l...
^^^
Line 17, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d without making mistakes which can only be identified when open to any contradic...
^^^
Line 20, column 94, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...d improvements in our ideas from people whos views we share we cant tackle loopholes...
^^^^
Line 20, column 117, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...deas from people whos views we share we cant tackle loopholes which we previously ov...
^^^^
Line 21, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that we can usually learn much more from people whose views we support than from ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2359.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97679324895 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7570675731 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478902953586 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.225428945 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.055555556 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.97078651685 362% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.564259089392 0.243740707755 231% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19161956877 0.0831039109588 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.246001759231 0.0758088955206 325% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20182771771 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.219703075265 0.0667264976115 329% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.