The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart illustrates number of incidents and injuries passenger got via different transportation like commuter rail, heavy rail, light rail and bus etc. in 2002. All the given numbers in chart are based on 100 million passenger miles travelled by transportation. Transportation types are plotted on x-axis and Number per 100 million PMT plotted on y-axis.

From the first glance at a chart, we can see that highest number of incidents happened with demand response more than 250 and more than 150 injuries happened in demand response. Lowest number of injuries and incidents happened in commuter rail with number of slightly half than 50.

While in heavy rail there are 50 incidents and slightly lower than 50 injuries got by passengers. In light rail transportation had a difference between incidents and injuries were almost double. Traveler got same number of incidents in bus with compare to light rail, but number of injuries was slightly more than 50 in bus transportation.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Lowest'.
Suggestion: The Lowest
...0 injuries happened in demand response. Lowest number of injuries and incidents happen...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86228783718 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512345679012 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7676156816 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259361343495 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138631416301 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681694153868 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191989694232 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103762186069 0.0819641961636 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.