The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.
The given charts reveal the information about the number of food budget for family meals stay in restaurant and home cooking, whereas the line graph illustrates the figure of meals eaten in two different places are fast food and sitdown restaurant from 1970 to 2010. The data is calibrated in percentum.
It can be seen that in the pie charts, in the initial year one tenth of the total meals in restaurant which were lowest proportion and 90 percent meals spent on home cooking at home. In 1980 and 1990 the percentage of family eaten in restaurant continued to increased steadily to 15% and 35% respectively. However, home cooking was decreased with the passage of time that was accounted for 85 and 65 percent. Intrestingly, in 2000, both were equal to half of the total meals.
In case of line graph, In 1970, both were started in the same point that was almost 20 percent. Morever, it increased the same trend in the year 1980 but fast food meals rose sharply throughout the period and reached the point almost 90% in the year 2000. In comparison to that, the sit down restaurant inclined gradually to approximately 50% in 2000.
Overall, it is evident that the number of meals in reataurant was incresed in the passage of time whereas, the fast food restaurant was significantly increase as compared to sitdown restaurant meals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the lowest'.
Suggestion: were the lowest
... of the total meals in restaurant which were lowest proportion and 90 percent meals spent o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n the year 2000. In comparison to that, the sit down restaurant inclined gradually to a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
... fast food restaurant was significantly increase as compared to sitdown restaurant meals...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63950722098 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528138528139 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5618791677 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34249194981 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115689044426 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118374315985 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220324737001 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0964340947647 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.