Over the past fifty years, international sports events such as the Olympic Games and world cup competitions have played an increasingly important role in our society. However, many people think such events are an enormous waste of money, time and effort.
The expenditure spent on the harboring the international sports events such as Olympics is considered wasting money, even though some individuals believe that organizing such affairs has many benefits for the countrymen in a long-term perspective. Both points of views will be analyzed in this argument before the reasoned conclusion is found.
It is argued that the expenses incurred by the hosting nation are a huge amount of money which can be spent instead on the development. It is shown in the study conducted by the planning commission in India that billions of dollars used in the promotional events for the Olympics. If this money saved, it will fund a large health project. Also, during the organizing period, all the machinery state gets diverted into the event, and the important tasks take a back a seat. Therefore, it is assumed that all the international events are unproductive expenditure on the exchequer.
On the other hand, the productivity of these events can't be gauged in one profit-loss equation. It should take into consideration the long-term factors such as boost the tourism and improvement of the ties between the participating nations. It was noticed that there is increase 40 % in the tourism in the United Kingdom after the Olympic Games which lead to increase in the revenue thereafter. Moreover, these events encourage the countrymen to participate in such constructive activities and endeavor for the pride of their country.
From the previous analysis, it is shown that the benefits from hosting the international sports events outweigh the expenses incurred. These events increase the influx of tourist so increase the income of the country. In addition, improve the foreign policy of the hosting country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oductive expenditure on the exchequer. On the other hand, the productivity of t...
^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... hand, the productivity of these events cant be gauged in one profit-loss equation. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26071428571 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93319616997 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546428571429 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7531085149 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.214285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228546881354 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690543939663 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558510142137 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135723089899 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284972427273 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.