Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?
Question.
Answer.
In a bid to improve their quality of life, skilled and educated citizens of poor countries tend to migrate abroad. While some believe it is acceptable, I rather disagree because of it’s harmful effect to the underdeveloped nations.
Firstly, The poor countries are drained of their intellectuals and skilled citizens. When these people migrate from their regions to the more developed countries, the poor states lose their human capital. These are the most advanced and promising population who would have contrbuted to the development of their communities. Consequently, these less advanced nations keep falling short of development. For example, the Nigeria health sector’s inabilities to reach a globally recommended standard is due to continued migration of its work force( doctors, nurses, etc) for greener pastures abroad as reported by Omolere et al 2015. For a nation to progress, it must lay hold of her prized assets-the educated and skilled individuals.
Furthermore, loss of cultural values is another effect. Having moved to a foreign land, with time those immigrants tend to forget about their cultural beliefs and values. This is so because they need to adapt to their new environment. Therefore, they forget nearly everything about their native sociocultural heritage. Resultantly, the worlds rich cultural diversity is lost. For cultures to be preserved, employment of work force from underdeveloped nations should be halted.
In conclusion, despite the seeming advantages of recruitment of staffs from third world countries by the advanced ones, I am of the opinion that it should be discouraged for its deleterious effects on the human capital and culture of those poor nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 622, Rule ID: ET_AL[1]
Message: A dot is missing here: 'et al.'
Suggestion: et al.
... pastures abroad as reported by Omolere et al 2015. For a nation to progress, it must...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o their new environment. Therefore, they forget nearly everything about their nat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53759398496 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02636248972 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.3182308707 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183998663922 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564960096475 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511626697454 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110871713552 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333708988333 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.