Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.
Children and their learning methods to be good member of society is the problem of controversy. Some people believe that it is parent responsibility while others claim opposite. In my view point, both, together would have their shares in upbringing kid.
First and foremost, thing is that due to long hours of working, parent have not enough time for kids and this is very heavy responsibility for them. Along with this, there are some item that only can educated by parents. For example, family can learn kids to separate wet and dry litters, help the elderly, be kind with other. Also, it should be noted that being responsible person is the trait which can be learned in school and family, both, together.
Schools and its methods of educate kids play an important role in upbringing them. It is partly because of that major proportion of kid’s time spent in school. They learn there, how to treat other, help them, make friend and become member of a group. The last item is the most important practice for their future life as a member of larger group as a community but school similar to family cannot alone pass this burden without help. Since, not being adequate time in school and its main role to educate kid are the main reason for lacking school in that.
To wrap it up, school and parent must have good relationship to help the kid become a good member of society. School teaches them fundamental principles of a community such as driving, general law while parent learn them treatment and consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'items'?
Suggestion: items
...r them. Along with this, there are some item that only can educated by parents. For ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, for example, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78409090909 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45025989045 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57196969697 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.192375442 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2142857143 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309088557827 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105704531682 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686161460358 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192542897352 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403051196018 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.