Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life?
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Though notorious life and privacy sound different, they are indirectly proportionate to each other. In other words, the more fame you have there will be less concealment in your personal life. Most of the famous people, for example, actors & actresses, got treated biasedly by media and so as their privacy. It is more often that their private life invasion is caused by their fame. In my opinion, people ought to provide some private space to esteemed personality, so that they can roam around freely.
Media should be the mirror for the people. However, for their recognition, they significantly objectify wealthy and glorious individual. Sporadically a small comment which might be the truth but not in favor of the audience, for example, had been represented exaggeratedly. This leads to celebrity less outspoken in public or even in social media, eventually.
Another aspect is privacy, which is indigenous to every individual and crucial as well, is also hampered prominently in case of a famous personality. Besides media, the public also interested in well-known people. When actors or actresses, for instance, go to any place with or without their partner, people and media tend to interfere them to get a glance of their persona.
Moreover, all these invasions are solely caused by massive publicity and popularity. Every individual has their idol to whom they follow blindly. For one glance of that person, people can go to any extent; which results not only in the incursion of well-known peoples privacy but also the overwhelming crowd, which exacerbate in open ground where the public have access to their admirable celebrity. Taking advantage of this sometimes media publish incident that happened under such circumstances and follower entertain this news remarkably.
In conclusion, every individual should get equal privacy irrespective to their position and fame. It is the media, who can turn the clock back and ought to be judiciously fair with everyone, by which famous people can breathe among the local crowd as well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28048780488 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80519284548 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8751269218 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2222222222 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316685772734 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100687070506 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752503449325 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173518986819 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904355712505 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.