Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life?
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Global demands for entertainment have exponentially shot up in the past few decades. A large part of the population believe that a celebrated personality enjoys far more privileges than an ordinary person and hence intrusion of their private lives is inevitably a small value in exchange of the popularity they have achieved. Having said that, some people believe in an equal right to privacy. I strongly opine that media should be restricted by privacy intrusion laws to protect celebrities from defaming and suffering personal issues publicly. In this essay, I shall discuss the merit and the demerits of paparazzi.
On one hand, media is extensively known for influencing the careers of celebrated personalities. Celebrated status is recognition to those who have remarkably achieved in their field of expertise. Famous people are usually considered to live a privileged and luxurious life. With a constant spotlight on certain famous beings, they are continuously under the scrutiny of the general public. For instance, a well-renouned cricketer is highly appreciated for is performance, although a single event of underperforming at a game can create extenuating circumstances for this same player. This creates unnecessary pressure and psychological disturbance at a personal level. A negatively overwhelming criticism from a large audience can be demotivational.
On the other hand, public figures suffer from curiosity and interference of personal decision-making process. The masses are highly opinionated on professional choices of a famous personality. For example, an actress was recently ridiculed for her professional choice of a specific role in a film. Even actors who choose to get married or divorced are perceived in a different way in the eyes of their followers.
Popularity often takes a toll on people's immediate family. Famous persons are unable to relish the simple joys of life, such as a walk on the beach or enjoying a local delicacy with their family. A well-known personality’s child is often mobbed my media disrupting their school schedule and creating difficulties for them to adjust to their fellow mates. A distinctive treatment leads ‘child-celebrities’ to feel superior to their peers. Media is capable of exposing a sensitive personal issue as a piece of entertainment to the masses, to hike the readership or just to popularize their shows.
In my view, media should abide by rules safeguarding the private life of popular personalities. Celebrities thriving on attention seeking behavioral patterns should not be promoted at all. Furthermore, media must learn to be sensitive towards the families of these popular people who often are dragged into the limelight without their consent. The revelation of personal contact details or relevant personal information can pose a threat to their life. Therefore, it is crucial to restrict boundaries to the intrusion of personal space as a preventive step towards maligning the reputation of famous persons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considered living'.
Suggestion: considered living
...of expertise. Famous people are usually considered to live a privileged and luxurious life. With a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... continuously under the scrutiny of the general public. For instance, a well-renouned crickete...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...o get married or divorced are perceived in a different way in the eyes of their followers. Pop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2553.0 1615.20841683 158% => OK
No of words: 464.0 315.596192385 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50215517241 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41886093598 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 176.041082164 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581896551724 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 828.0 506.74238477 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0596399605 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1923076923 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249321773405 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633521921469 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464018244454 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136077694678 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528948690933 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 78.4519038076 200% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.