Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
This is the contentious statement that employer should solicit the personal information of their perspective employee i.e hobbies, marital status, et cetera has sparked a heated debate among many. I will illustrate the pros and cons of the statement and at last, will provide my view.
To start with, the employer asking the personal information for job seekers in their application to gauge the potential hire's best fit for the particular vacancy. For instance, if a particular position required a lot of travelling in multiple metropolitan cities of the world, then it will be difficult to a married employee, as he/she has to fulfil his/her marital commitments. In addition, the hobbies of a person can reflect their area of work interest. The employer used the information, regarding hobbies, to increase the rate of retention of their employ. For example, a financial analyst, who is fond of latest technology eagerly wishes to work with high tech corporation rather than the employee who despises the latest technology.
On the other hand, there are some cons to ask the personal information from the potential. For example, sometimes employer inadvertently lose the best-qualified candidate as they have the concern to share their personal information with anyone. Moreover, personal information may create the discrepancy situation in process of hiring. let say if the interviewer despises the cricket, then he may not consider the individual who is having the passion for cricket.
Having considered a range of the argument, I firmly believe the merit of the organization seeking personal information from the candidate is overweighed the drawback. By getting personal information they can choose the best fit for a particular job position and it can help an organization to increase their rate of retention of current employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...ample, a financial analyst, who is fond of latest technology eagerly wishes to work with ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Let
...repancy situation in process of hiring. let say if the interviewer despises the cri...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35051546392 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03369675051 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0660265118 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.769230769 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31812696457 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11091583592 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643158461552 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179465481822 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759329060996 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.