Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information my be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Data gathering during the pre-interview process has been topic of discussion. Where some believes information such as their preferred leisure activities or marital status is completely irrelevant while others disagree. This essay believes acquainting the organization about these information is not a matter of concern because it could be used to analyze the candidates’ efficiency, at the same time it could be shared for profit gains.
On the one hand, data given to these organization could be sold to the third-party company whose major work is to gather personal data, and these information could be employed into various ways such as marketing or influencing the masses on certain issues. In other words, data these days are as valuable as gold because it has proven out to be the key for prediction analysis for business models. The Times reported recently that the data provided to the job portals, of jobseekers, are mostly from employers who conducts the interviews which is later used for marketing by these companies. However, data required by these companies are already present in the internet, such as the Facebook or the Google, so the interviewee should not have any concern of privacy breaching.
On the other hand, psychologists suggests employs’ productivity could be predicted from their basic information. This means a person’s choices of activities to unwind themselves clearly states its work efficiency. In other words, for any organization their labor force should always be efficient in order to provide better end-result. Additionally, marital status indicates the possibility of stretching the working hours or business travelling when required. A married person is less likely to commit itself to such requirement as their family is dependent on them. A research in Yale university, which is ranked among the elite institutes, suggests that pre-analyzing the employees at the time of hiring gives better outcome in the longer run.
In conclusion, although the data provided by the candidate for interviews process seems to be at the risk, nevertheless, these data provides an edge to their candidature if their personal information are coinciding with the companies’ requirement
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...eves acquainting the organization about these information is not a matter of concern because it c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this organization' or 'these organizations'?
Suggestion: this organization; these organizations
...ains. On the one hand, data given to these organization could be sold to the third-party compan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...or work is to gather personal data, and these information could be employed into various ways suc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: Research
...t as their family is dependent on them. A research in Yale university, which is ranked amo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, third, while, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47398843931 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12317974652 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56936416185 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5121218498 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.285714286 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212796214344 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770778949946 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510484071204 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138223599435 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161026823156 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.