A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the technological era, many people believe that animals should not be hurt for any research and food activities. However, some oppose that it is mandatory to use animal as research, food and other purposes to survive in this world. I believe that we should treat animals same as human, they have the same life as people have.
On the one hand, livestock are essential part of life cycle. They keep our life cycle running all the time, but most of the species are endangered now, due to uncommon behavior of human. Animals have feelings and emotions, but they cannot show to others. Recent survey shows that many animal species are in danger of extinction due to scientist use like medical and research trial. If people use them continuously for various day, one day it would not be part of our biosphere. Extinction of the animal results into tsunami, earthquake and many other disaster activities. Therefore, it is best that we do not hurt them and do not break our life cycle of the earth.
On the Other hand, people conceive that animals are useful for medicines and food purposes. They are important source of multi vitamins and some beauty products. For example, salmon fish can provide vitamin B12 as well as crocodile use for some leather products. They are source of our various need. So, it is best humans must have to use animals for science and other activities.
Conclude, we believe that animal can useful for various purposes and they can provide many advantages to human life, but as I said that they can feel everything as we humans feel. The difference between them and us is that they may not express their feeling as we humans do. Therefore, people should treat them nicely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
... are source of our various need. So, it is best humans must have to use animals for sci...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39459116283 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47972972973 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4343591631 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1111111111 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437467626788 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144621414382 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999098988388 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29590892109 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910943407357 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.