In many countries it is now illegal to smoke in public places. It is only fair that people who wish to smoke should have to leave the building. Do you agree or disagree?
Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It has been observed that laws are enforced by the government to prohibit smoking in public places. In this case, the people who want to smoke should satisfy their desire in isolation and not socially. In my opinion, I strongly agree that it is correct to forbid people from smoking in public areas as it has negative impact on other people.
To begin with, the foremost reason for prohibiting smoking in public area is the adverse effects it has on the health of passive smokers. If the people smoke in public, then others who inhale this smoke also get affected by cardio vascular and respiratory diseases. Thus, the smoking person puts the life of other people also in trouble, so smoking in public places should be strictly avoided. For example, research has shown that secondary smokers have higher risk of heart failure than the main smoker
Another reason for restricting smoking in public is it leaves negative effect on the minds of innocent children. A child is immature to understand the repercussions of smoking and may imitate the act when he sees elders doing the same. Apparently, they set a bad example to others, particularly to their younger generation and indirectly encourage them to follow their footpath. Therefore, by framing such law, a country can protect the young generation from indulging into smoking.
Finally, limiting the public smoking will create a thought in person that this act is inappropriate and not allowed in public. In other words, the smoker would realise that he should not smoke as it is harmful to the society. Hence, such restrictions may encourage smokers to come out of their addiction and live a healthy life.
In conclusion, I pen down saying that smoking in public is harmful as it affect the health of other people and spoils the young generation to get into the addiction. Moreover, such laws to prevent smoking in public can prove inspiring for people to get rid of smoking and thus, in public places smoking must be restricted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 74, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...that smoking in public is harmful as it affect the health of other people and spoils t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, finally, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93175074184 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56431333434 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522255192878 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2623964116 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283805478833 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104852996751 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514512588502 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172444853414 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469702774172 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.