In many countries, paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common.
Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages?
It is often argued that the development of technology is seriously necessary to live our life more comfortable. Some people might think that the types of payment are going to be more ordinary and easier to use through the modern devices among many nations. Although it offers the comfort to proceed, this trend has more disadvantages. This essay will address the perspective of paying things using the electronic equipment.
First of all, it recalls the increase of the rate of unemployment when this development becomes common. To put it another way, when individuals handle the mobile apps to pay something that they have to do such as the monthly rent, the actual tasks existing in the bank might decrease due to the visiting declines. For example, when coming over to pay is useless for customers anymore, the employees who work at the financial companies would lose their jobs because they have nothing to do for helping clients to pay. Thus, this may connect to the social issue when using mobile apps are increasingly usual.
Moreover, some illegal actions might happen from the use of cellphone. An abundance of scam would be committed as online financial crime because some apps have very weak security. For instance, the number of frauds takes a chance to transfer other people's transactions to their illegal account and then they eventually steal money because it is difficult to catch up. Therefore, mobile phone apps may be the cause that many individuals lose their money without perception.
In conclusion, in spite of the fact that the efficiency of the use of the cellphone, very risky situations exist nowadays. We need to encouage people to be careful when they operate it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01413427562 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63288113667 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597173144876 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.430329637 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.357142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331516750611 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994727189973 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590034031322 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160982003708 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978724156741 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.