Some people consider price as most important thing to consider when buying a product (such as a cell phone) or a service (e.g. medical treatment). Do you agree or disagree?
Price is one of the crucial parameters to consumers as well as producers. Few consider price to be a decisive factor while purchasing a product or a service and I agree to this thought. In this essay, I will discuss how usability of product effects the purchasing behavior and also touch upon where the price could be overlooked along with relevant examples to support the points.
There is ample evidence that purchasing of a product at specific price is dependent on multiple factors. If a customer believes the utility of a product does not justify the asking price, a cheaper product meeting all the requirements is preferred. To illustrate this, according to an Oxford research study, a mobile company which produces cell phones with similar features of a luxury brand albeit with inferior quality, commands a 10% higher market share due to its cheaper price. Therefore it is possible to state that utility of a product is important factor in pricing a product.
On the contrary, there are many instances where standard of service should precede the cost of it. Life changing decisions such as treatment for illness and vaccinations should not be price sensitive. The quality of treatment is directly proportional to efficient combat of disease or disorder. A recent vaccine for flu is a classic example for this. A medical firm who vaccinated citizens at a discounted price for flu, received many complaints of side effects from users. Thus it is possible to state that a compromise has to be made on price when seeking a better service.
In conclusion, although rates of services can be overlooked in some occurrences, more often than not consumers should be careful when paying a premium for a product or service depending on usefulness of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s producers. Few consider price to be a decisive factor while purchasing a produ...
^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s thought. In this essay, I will discuss how usability of product effects the pur...
^^
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e is ample evidence that purchasing of a product at specific price is dependent o...
^^
Line 2, column 485, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... market share due to its cheaper price. Therefore it is possible to state that utility o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 509, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cheaper price. Therefore it is possible to state that utility of a product is im...
^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... complaints of side effects from users. Thus it is possible to state that a compromi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97619047619 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81289226675 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58843537415 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0402389103 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232017794941 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770932061217 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527598971392 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128172512934 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204271987064 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.