Some people say that in all level of education, from primary school to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is thought by some people that all educational system pay too much attention to theoretical material rather than spend more time to obtain experience related to future specialties. In my opinion, I agree that all levels education should provide at the first place necessary theory and facts about subjects as it will greatly benefit both learners and university.
A good reason spending more time at school by learning theory is that this builds up foundation knowledge about subjects. In other words, facts and theoretical material like core which is contained in all educational system. It indisputably will benefit young people’s future career and facilitate the beginning of work. If new born employees will be aware of the majority theory related to particular work they potentially will be high qualified in company. For example, financial specialists will count and plan budget effectively consider that they perfectly know all economics and math facts.
Another point to consider that having suitable theoretical knowledge means that students could research for scientific purpose. At present, some of students interested in studying subjects more deeply that leads to explore theory and facts. It also helps students to achieve high academic results at schools that allow them benefit awards and acknowledge. This propound scientists can continue their education in many ways. Moreover they can win academic competitions and be awarded that undoubtedly high result for both learners and school.
To conclude, obtaining theoretical material gives those essential skills that as vital for personal educational progress as for future work experience. However, learning of subjects is also should be strictly controlled by teachers and professors in order to avoid students spend too much time learning excessive amount of useless materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'levels'' or 'level's'?
Suggestion: levels'; level's
...alties. In my opinion, I agree that all levels education should provide at the first p...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 327, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r and facilitate the beginning of work. If new born employees will be aware of the...
^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the students') or simply say ''some students''.
Suggestion: some of the students; some students
...rch for scientific purpose. At present, some of students interested in studying subjects more de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... continue their education in many ways. Moreover they can win academic competitions and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... excessive amount of useless materials.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, as for, for example, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57243816254 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8047145316 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597173144876 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6991491445 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.642857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155398913237 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050806662222 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536676703635 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102744483245 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487843229248 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.