Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill. Do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that, education authorities pay more attention on learning pure facts rather than sufficient feasible abilities for students. I completely agree with this ascertain which should be examined profoundly.
On the one hand, I would argue that studying theoretical subjects for schoolers should be legitimate in terms of the importance of lessons. In the first place, the students’ curriculum are often full with many unimportant theoretical information while these will be forgotten as long as students finish school. For example, although math is a vital subject that must be educated at schools, most of its complex theories are impractical for the future, except for those who want to specifically continue this major to upper education at university. Consequently, it is important to know by consuming much more time on educating pure information might lead students to avoid attending or continuing school time due to experiencing unproductive.
On the other hand, we should create an effective environment in which pupils would be encouraged to participate in more seriously in school activities for future careers. In fact, when it comes to competencies, an eligible person with commodious abilities will get into job interviews quicker than others with no effective experience. What’s more, students’ interest might have been recognized by end of school time, if adequate time is given to practical fields. Finally, there is no doubt that self-confidence and self-esteem could be enhanced for occupation period by employing valuable time on real practices at university or school. What administers admire a lot is facing a confident applicant who is talented in various strings.
In conclusion, I do believe that more time in all levels of education should be dedicated to acquiring productive abilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | sanjugohel | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Tejwani | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | Tejwani | 73 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion? 84
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, if, so, while, except for, for example, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54225352113 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19605055327 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654929577465 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1791479055 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117610338391 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452248659293 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401409764401 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082739115948 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262748052878 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.