Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools. Others, however, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools.
Educating children under gender-based institutions are considered to be a good option by a few. However, co-education has positive aspects too. In my opinion, children studying at mixed schools have benefits, which is explained in the essay below.
On the one hand, firstly, it is easier to teach a bunch of same gender kids, compared to having them both. Secondly, children tend to astray of their goals when there prevails any discomfort with the other gender sometimes. For example, it is easy for a sex education class to be comfortably taught for a particular group and kids can easily open up to make their points, even though it is a taboo prevailing in our society. Finally, the students who are conservative, still has lots of opportunities to show their potential in their academics without any trouble.
On the other hand, when kids grow separately, they become more conservative and socialize less with the opposite sex while we expect them to not have a presumption. Moreover, at a tender age both genders exhibit distinct behavior, even though there is no reasoning about that. To illustrate this, a teacher recently voiced her opinion, that the boys at the pre kinder levels tend to be unfocused and wandering their minds off elsewhere, in comparison with girls, who are highly attentive in the class. Unfortunately, the reason is unknown to her, rather she helps all of them. Furthermore, the social skills when mandated, while they are young, it is more effective. In addition, they also have a sense of allegiance with the opposite sex.
To conclude, mixed schools bring in both genders together and help them stay out of their cocoon and grow without being shy of each other.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, in addition, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97894736842 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77638105852 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624561403509 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6248091753 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.357142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0543398225369 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0203818412385 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240969218121 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0362100123862 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235446818637 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.