Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Nowadays world is changing at its full swing and we are moving towards advanced era where almost everything can be done with the help of technology. But on the other hand there is contradiction arises that people now is less happy than people in the past. I strongly believe that people in the present generation is more comfortable and satisfied than people in the past. The reasons are in few points which I am going to cover in below passage.
To begin with, for our generation there are various kind of technology so that we can tackle with problem easily. Technology helps to minimize the effort and the work can be done at a spur of the moment. For example introduction of Google Quantum Coupling is proved very effective in doing those calculation which the past generation will take ten thousand years to solve but with the help of Quantum Coupling it can be done in 2.5 minutes. The advancement of technologies is proved very beneficial to live a leisure life.
Secondly, there is abundance of job opportunities in every area in today’s generation than in past. Every field is acquiring skilled employees and labour force. Advancement in industries and manufacturing trades opens a vast variety of jobs many facilities that comes with those jobs. For example when I was working in Google my salary was twenty times more than my father and many facilities were also provided with it like cars, house, insurance, funds and, retirement pension.
In conclusion introduction of technologies and job opportunities made our lives easier and comfortable than past generation
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
...h, for our generation there are various kind of technology so that we can tackle wit...
^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this calculation' or 'those calculations'?
Suggestion: this calculation; those calculations
...pling is proved very effective in doing those calculation which the past generation will take ten...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ry area in today's generation than in past. Every field is acquiring skilled emplo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 265.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84137662873 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569811320755 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8623819309 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.923076923 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27102324422 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921342106817 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118465582733 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155139236524 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125306392901 0.0645574589148 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.