Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote.
In modern societies, children above 15 years of age are growing up so fast and catching up to the technology better than adults. They are developing their own apps these days, working and many other things that they are excelling at. They are even getting good at understanding politics these days. There is hot topic of debate between the people who think children over age 15 should vote or not. Some people hold the idea that kids are immature and should not be allowed to vote, while others think children these days are improving in many area than children of previous generation and should be given a chance to vote. Although it is a highly controversial topic, I think the latter opinion carries more weight. In the following I will elaborate on why I support this idea.
The foremost reason why I support this idea lies in the fact that allowing children over 15 to vote would encourage them to know more about politics. I believe that everyone who knows what candidate should be the next president should be given a chance to support their decision. But if we discourage them without even thinking that they know nothing about politics, we are discouraging them and this would decrease the chance for young adults to be politics. Last month I read in the newspaper that in a study conducted by a group of researchers found that children over 15 in high school have more idea about politics than they estimated. Thus, by giving them a chance to support the candidate they wanted to win will encourage them to be good decision makers and also they would be interested in politics.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that encouraging teenagers to vote would also make them better at politics which is better for the country. This would involve these kids more into politics which makes some of them to think about pursuing a career in politics. For example, I have a cousin who is sixteen years old. There was discussion that was happening in my around the time of last presidential elections. We were having a debate on who would win. My cousin steps in and he makes many good points on why a particular candidate is going to win. Everyone in that room is shocked by his point and his meticulous details about these candidates about what they have done to the country. He was actually convinced everyone in that room to vote to that candidate. So, by allowing these teenagers would help them to make their point and help them for a stepping stone in the political career.
Due to the aforementioned argument explored in the previous statements I believe that children above fifteen years should be given a chance to vote.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 50
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 60
- the best way for a society to prepare its young citizen in political world is by instilling co-operative sense, not competition. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 539, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun area seems to be countable; consider using: 'many areas'.
Suggestion: many areas
...nk children these days are improving in many area than children of previous generation an...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, thus, while, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70386266094 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48878195593 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442060085837 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6912925499 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6363636364 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325654044083 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913446106632 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121392883516 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226489540226 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117257607444 0.0645574589148 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.