Computers vs. traditional school
Nowadays, with developing technology, in addition to traditional school, students have another choice to learn their lessons, they can use the internet to educate themselves. Definitely, if some people asked would agree with the statement that children could use the computer for learning process instead of participating in the class while others have a negative attitude toward this subject. As I am concerned, I believe that traditional school would more beneficial for students. In the following paragraph, I will shed light on arguments to support my views.
The first and most reason is that in schools, professional teachers educate students in an efficient way that prevents of wasting time to find proper references to understand the topic of lessons. There are many solutions for one topic and many of them are so hard to understand by your own alone but by participating in class teachers have enough experience, they know how to teach their students. To illustrate that idea let’s consider the following example. I remember, when I was in high school, I had a problem with solving equation math. I had to search on the internet for finding a reasonable and understandable explanation to solve the equation but I was more confused by internet solution. But when I asked my teacher to help me, he solves the question with the easiest way and I totally understand it.
The second reason is that traditional schools have well equipped and facilities to create condition that children best use of these tools to get their purposes in the labs. Besides, there is a vigilance technician that always watches students in order to protect them from dangers that might happen in the labs. For instance, the student who wants to do the chemistry experiment needs the specific tools and material that are very expensive to buy them by himself. Furthermore, many of those experiments would dangerous if they were done in the wrong way. So they need someone who is expert in this area.
Finally, when students take place in school, they can strengthen their some social behavior including group working skills. In schools, students have to accomplish a number of tasks together and distribute their duty according to their abilities. Because of this, the skill of group working enhances during their education.
By the way of conclusion, base on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that the advantages of participating in class over weigh than learning by computers. The student could use of experienced teachers that ease the learning and also they can use the equipment under the vigilance of expert technician.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... professional teachers educate students in an efficient way that prevents of wasting time to find p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'children the best'.
Suggestion: children the best
...and facilities to create condition that children best use of these tools to get their purpose...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der the vigilance of expert technician.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09237875289 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83013696387 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526558891455 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0386302886 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.65 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111017059214 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334517296179 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576278246596 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607915067271 0.150856017488 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640617483023 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.