Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
It is widely acknowledged that friends play a very key role in every person's life. Therefore, it is significant for one to maintain this friendship until the very end. In this case, some might hold the view that owning such friendship with a small group of people, while it is long lasting, is actually much better than having many friendly relationships with a huge group of people. Personally, I contend that the smaller the group of friends is, the steadier their relationship definitely is. Hereinafter, by alluding to three prominent reasons, I will shed light on my own perspective.
The first noteworthy point regarding the issue is that having less people containing the group of friends brings about a special trust among friends, for not only will they feel better about sympathizing with each other about their problems, but also it will be much easier for them to talk about these problems with one another. For example, back in high school, I used to be part of such small group which was consisted of three people including myself. When I was spending my time with my other two friends, I used to feel like that it was my second home, for not only was our group comprised of few people where I could talk about my problems much easier there, but also it was an opportunity given to us in order to learn how to trust one another; therefore, our group was strong enough to maintain until now.
The other axiomatic point is that a short group actually gives the members a better chance in order to interact with one another. As said in the last paragraph, it would definitely result in a more appropriate place for the members to sympathize and speak about their problems to one another. To exemplify my very own experience at high school again, since my group of friends was short, it gave us the opportunity to talk to each other about the things that were not easy to talk about with any other friend or our family members, for it was included of sufficient people that provided us a type of special trust in order to speak straightforward with one another. Thus, this made our friendship to last until the current moment.
The other significant point regarding the issue is that the shorter the number of the members is, the better the members can be able to meet and spend their time with one another, for it could be much easier for them to remember each other. To allude to my group of friends in high school again, since our group was not consisted of too many people, it gave us the opportunity to meet almost every day. For instance, we used to hang out in different places, and even it gave us the chance to study with one another without losing our focus on our studies. Thus, we somehow learned how to work as a team with one another.
To make a long story short, smaller groups bring about a particular trust among friends, for the number of the people comprising that group is short, and therefore, gives the members the opportunity to sympathize with one another. Furthermore, it results in better interactions while every member is certain that they can trust the other member.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...t friends play a very key role in every persons life. Therefore, it is significant for ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...oint regarding the issue is that having less people containing the group of friends ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 580, Rule ID: ENTIRELY_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'group composed of'?
Suggestion: group composed of
...as my second home, for not only was our group comprised of few people where I could talk about my ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 52.1666666667 173% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2560.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 552.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63768115942 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84713113593 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49568783745 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.407608695652 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.0 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.1405221538 48.9658058833 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.222222222 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 20.6045352989 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170551166988 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633239228508 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436241914256 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115766347608 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213552547959 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.