Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Regarding the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more significant that making many friends, I am strongly inclined to take the side of this expression. Being of the most proliferated social subject in all relationship, the duration of friendship plays a critical role to reinforce the emotional feeling among friend. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, the trust can be attributed to the profound characteristic of any friendship. It is obvious this feature can be implied as the core factor in the social relationship and catalysis the intimate of the friendship. For instance, people in some hard conditions tend to find the trustful person who can share some matters with them. Without trust, the people are not capable enough to establish the emotional connection. Considering the trust formation, there is a causal relationship between the period of friendship on the one hand, and the breadth of mutual trust on the other hand. As a result, by maintaining friendship over a long period, the high level of trust can be anticipated.
Another primary reason can be attributed to the strengthen of confidence in the long period friendship. Due to the harsh condition of the society such as experience of more stress, economic problem and marital difficulties, the necessity of the confidence become crystal clear. It goes without saying every one has tendency to confide the person who is known during the long time. Thus, in this case, the period of friendship plays a crucial role. It is also worth noting that long period friendship makes the high potential of upholding in critical situations.
Taking all of these perspectives into account, I cannot agree more about the preference of maintaining friendship for a long period regarding the better establishment of the trust, strengthening the confidence and the high potential of upholding in critical situations. Although, making many friends easily can be attributed the social and affable personality of a person, To my best knowledge, the advantages of retaining the a few friends categorically outweigh the disadvantages of having many temporary friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...he ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...th a small number of people over a long period of time is more significant that making many fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...her primary reason can be attributed to the strengthen of confidence in the long period friend...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
... knowledge, the advantages of retaining the a few friends categorically outweigh the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, then, thus, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25414364641 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06031470324 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519337016575 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1997596149 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271220751014 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895970408048 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847079197403 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179947090265 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804295143041 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.