Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
What is the most important thing to make a friend? Some people believe the ability to make friends is more important to maintain a long relationship with a small number of people. However, this statement is superficial and unfounded that the most important is to sustain a long relationship with few friends for happiness.
Some skepticism usually claims that friends need more and more to make people popular and in a good relationship. If people all go to the club have some fun, making new friends can open their relationship to show their power and make everyone be their friends. If some old friends forget them, just to find another new one to sustain their high social relationship. But those friends might not true friends who really know everything about them. The long relationship friends are the one who really knows about each other can help each other when they are in bad mood, other easily new friends always come when there is some fun. If people are in bad mood and need someone to comfort, usually the old friend will appear to take care of them.
Skepticism still argued that wield relationship with new friends from doctor to lawyer might help them to deal with make trouble. When people are in lawsuits, a lawyer friend might help them to solve the problem; When people need some political help, a mayor friend can help people to handle anything smoothly. However, those statements won't happen since those are acquirement relationships that they won't willing to help people to solve any problem. By contrast, a long friendship people will willing to help their friends because their relationship is as hard as the stone, anything will not break their friendship. Like the above example, maintain a friendship with few people is more important and useful than the alternative ones.
The most important thing is the long relationship friends share everything with each other include happy stories and sad events. They share everything and they accompany each other no matter when or where. Although the friendship with the long period usually left in a small number of people, those friends just the true friend for happiness and for sadness. When people achieve they can share happiness rather than jealous; When they get in trouble, friends will give a hand and participated rather than run away. That is a true friend should be.
Like the aforementioned example, it is very important that maintaining friendships with a small number of people outweighs to make any new friends in little friendship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...nt to maintain a long relationship with a small number of people. However, this statement is supe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 267, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ip with the long period usually left in a small number of people, those friends just the true fri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...rtant that maintaining friendships with a small number of people outweighs to make any new friend...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, really, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2102.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95754716981 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56813090959 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424528301887 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0897742573 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.45110844103 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326551887928 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127948581583 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101770502219 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237166597026 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795635700578 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.5 8.01818996416 81% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.