Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? all universities students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Needless to say, one of the most important things which all students have to consider, because of its impact on their social and personal lives, is courses which they want to take. Therefore, all students have always been trying to take courses which are useful and suitable for them. In this regard, some people believe that universities have to require students to take history courses regardless of their majors. I agree with this view and I will discuss my reasons in the following paragraphs.
Some people believe that taking unrelated courses will reduce students' concentration. Such people wrongly believe that in the modern time all sciences developed very deeply and in order to be a success in one major you have to focus on one major completely in order to learn it in the best way that will help you to find suitable jobs. Therefore, these people have posed that requiring students to take unrelated courses like history courses will waste their time, which they have to spend to learn their main subjects; consequently, this requirement will have a negative impact on students' future, hence universities should not require students to take history courses. I disagree with this view because awareness about historical events, will help students to know about changes which have happened in their society; consequently, they will be able to have a suitable orientation about programs that governments want to perform in their countries. You can take me as the best example for this case. When I was bachelor student I had taken one history courses about my country, then I have been able to analyze governments' programs at this time based on my acknowledge about other programs which had been performed and I usually have a good orientation about these programs. Thus, taking history courses help us to be aware of our countries events.
Taking history courses help people to be more active citizens. This topic has been discussed by many sociologists that the majority of them believe that when individuals know about their countries' history especially political history, they can recognize all political block in their countries that help them to make a good decision on different elections, which help them to have better societies. Therefore, these sociologists believe that universities have to require students to take history courses. By way of illustration, I can refer to some statistics which have been published by many international organizations. Based on these statistics approximately all developed countries have required their students to take history courses when they are bachelor students. Thus, taking history courses help individuals to make a better decision about their lives.
In brief, as I discussed in the following paragraphs, some people believe that all students have to be forced to take history courses. I argued that this opinion is correct for a couple of reasons. First, history courses help individuals to have right orientations about governments' programs which lead to making a change in their societies, second, taking history courses will be useful for individuals in order to choose suitable candidate during different elections.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help you find' instead.
Suggestion: help you find
...r to learn it in the best way that will help you to find suitable jobs. Therefore, these people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2680.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 511.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2446183953 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76160400857 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.391389432485 0.524837075471 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 845.1 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.139935044 48.9658058833 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.55 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261499031211 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114309460176 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595812919659 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20181125667 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293450426428 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.