Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Students are a crucial part of our society. It is very hard to guides pupils in correct ways in order to teach them efficient. Some people believe that it is very vital that all students take history courses in all university and learn more about it even if their field major are different, while others hold an opposite view and refute it. In my opinion, it is very ridiculous that university force students to take history courses without considering their field of study for two noticeable reasons.
The main reason is that taking history courses waste students' energy that cause them to loss their focus on their own study. All majors have tons of courses that students really need a lot of time to handle them. If university push pupils to take unnecessary courses such as history, not only they fail to concentrate on their main courses but also they become disappointed about wasting energy and time. For example, when I was in university, I studied mechanic engineering. I almost took ten courses each semester that were very huge responsibility to do all assignments at the same time. Although it was very hard time, I hardly tried to manage them in order to graduate. However, university set new policy that all students should take history courses so as to graduate. Unfortunately, I was very socking about that rule because I even did not have any time to take rest. This added courses caused me to fail two my main courses at the end of semester and become upset. This experience taught me that it is very bad decision that all students in university to pass history courses.
Another reason is that all student pass introductory history courses in high school, they do not need more history courses when they study in different field. When they pass this course early and it is not necessary, university can invest money for improving facility or services instead of wasting their budget. For example, when I was a student in university, all students had to take history courses every semester in order learn more about history of country. One day, they began to protest about this law and try to force university manager to change plan of taking courses. University under severe pressure from students conceded to eliminate history courses. As over time, all part of university became to advance significantly such as adding new bus or food. As you can see, it is wasting money to force students who passed history courses in high school.
In conclusion, I personality believe that forcing student to take history courses is very bad regulation because not only they miss their energy but also they pass these courses in high school. University should take more care about its policy in order help student.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...on is that taking history courses waste students energy that cause them to loss their fo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 757, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ll students should take history courses so as to graduate. Unfortunately, I was very soc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87339055794 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52637453516 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44635193133 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 743.4 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8535996375 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7391304348 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2608695652 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28121679378 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101154878204 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664011126699 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206316813653 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024863701465 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.