Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Although studying history can make people learn from the past and get to know more about their own country and culture, it can not provide any information that require in different field. Personally, I disagree with the statement. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in my following essay.
To begin with, forcing all students to take history courses might be a waste of time. To be more specific, other students who major in different field rather than history can not obtain useful knowledge for them. Take me as an example, I am a college student major in computer science. We learn about how to implement machines and software. However, the computer and programmning skills are not invented until twenty century. How can the computer science students gain useful knowledge from history? In this case, taking history courses is wasting time for them. There is a better way to exert these time such as doing their sideprojects or reasearch about the novel programming languages.
Futhermore, if the university required all students take the history courses, it may not be effective and productive. Some students are not interest in history, they might skip the courses or even talking with others in class. These behaviors might interrupt professors and other students who want to learn about history. In this case, the process of the courses might be slow and uneffectiveness and students can not receive knowledge which might be helpful because they can not be focus on class. Moreover, the money spent by the university to open more history courses and hire more professors is also not useful and productive.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the university should not require all sudents to take the history courses no matter what field they are major in.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...ng skills are not invented until twenty century. How can the computer science students ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, i feel, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02675585284 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61324104477 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535117056856 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4362029027 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4117647059 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338371783465 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110055881264 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087166680069 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219118714165 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643126452178 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.