Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
our modern life today is full with tremendous amounts of events, and we all try to keep our self in the loop by following all the available news channels
I agree with the statement that we need to broaden our news resources in order to get enough information. Different new channels expose to diversity in opinions. Also, it will expand our knowledge as various resources have variable coverages, and enable us to determine which one to trust more.
First, being exposed to different resources will enhance the diversity in our mindset as every channel has its very own view of what occurred. This diversity is vital to open our eyes to both sides of what we call the truth. But when we only watch one source, we will adapt to this point of view blindly. We will probably follow this biased direction without exploring the opposing side. For instance, I used to watch only CNN news channel, so I found myself influenced in my views severely. When I get in any discussion, I felt that I am prejudice to this channel's direction. I had a deadlock with my friends. Therefore, they advised me to watch other channels, such as FOX news. After I explored the other avenues, they carry a different opinion, it opened my eyes to see a full picture. If I had not explored these opposing views, I would not have gained this great experience.
Moreover, exploring more channels will give excellent coverage to the event. If a channel misses one side of the story, other sites will compensate that shortage. Besides, different resources provide information in various ways. For example, people can find the same news presented in the written form, such as newspapers, or life coverage on television. Then comments on the report will give more views, and some witnesses say. This huge amount of data will enable us to be well informed with every possible detail.
In conclusion, I recommend anyone needs to be well informed to explore various kinds of channels. Doing so will enhance the quality of our knowledge related to the surrounding events which make us alert and vigilant to what happened around us.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Our
our modern life today is full with tremendo...
^^^
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the loop by following all the available news channels I agree with the statemen...
^^
Line 4, column 558, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'channels'' or 'channel's'?
Suggestion: channels'; channel's
...ion, I felt that I am prejudice to this channels direction. I had a deadlock with my fri...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80939226519 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59880746695 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4001608276 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9047619048 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2380952381 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158935420379 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473183903493 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529345601662 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960087417733 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028378217846 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Our
our modern life today is full with tremendo...
^^^
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the loop by following all the available news channels I agree with the statemen...
^^
Line 4, column 558, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'channels'' or 'channel's'?
Suggestion: channels'; channel's
...ion, I felt that I am prejudice to this channels direction. I had a deadlock with my fri...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80939226519 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59880746695 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4001608276 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9047619048 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2380952381 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158935420379 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473183903493 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529345601662 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960087417733 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028378217846 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.