Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.
In today's sophisticated and progressive world, in which we live, people are overwhelmed with a plethora of tasks and duties. In this line of thought, so many people believe that being inundated with many different types of tasks, people are expert at few things. Others, on the contrary, stand on the other side of the continuum. I, personally, concur with the latter notion because of two main reasons, on which i will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, sharing experience and knowledge assist people to accomplish task which they are allocated to very well. To be more specific, living in the age of technology bring us a plethora of opportunities. Internet as one of the most conspicuous fruit of technology, which helps people to share their experiences in today life. In this way, before starting to do any task individuals can readily find invaluable information in that area by just typing down several related keywords in searching engines. For example, YouTube as a very precious source of information, assist human being's by invaluable video clips that masters uploaded there for others usage. In this fascinating web site you can find materials related to every topic from very basic to professional levels.
Secondly, living in today's unpredictable life people have to be versatile people. To clarify more, in today's societies everyday people lose their job because of unpredictable recession in economy. In this situation, people need to be able to change their jobs and be expert in one another. My personal experience would help to put this notion into a vivid picture. Last year I was working in an Oil and gas company but because of the sudden drop in oil price, they had to dismiss me. Therefore, I started to attend advertising classes and less than a month I begun to work as a phone sealer. Thus, had I not been able to shift suddenly from a job to another, I would not have been able to find a new job.
All in all, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons bring us to the conclusion that today people are able to do a with variety of tasks very well. For, individuals share their experience easily and there are so many ways to this and because unpredictable life have forced people to be versatile ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...eople believe that being inundated with many different types of tasks, people are expert at fe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...n because of two main reasons, on which i will elaborate in the following paragra...
^
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: WEB_SITE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'website'?
Suggestion: website
...e for others usage. In this fascinating web site you can find materials related to every...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86233766234 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80691866224 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553246753247 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1129498655 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.5263157895 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201916710521 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551354253568 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557885801018 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135028777674 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565872278951 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.