Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to improve the quality of education in a
country is to increase teachers’ salaries.
No one can overlook the fact that teachers are the key factor of education in a country, and they should be praised. However, improving the quality of education relies on other different things such as university level, students’ passion of learning, and method of teaching as well, and students can play an important role in quality of education too. Were I asked to answer whether increasing teacher’s salary is the best way to improve the quality of education, I would answer it is not the best way. Among countless reasons, which can vindicate my point of view, I will mention the two most conspicuous ones through the following paragraphs.
To commence with, one of the best way to enhance the quality of education is well-equipped laboratories. Students provided with equipment conduct their research more successfully, and therefore the quality of education will be improved. Statistics have shown that most of the articles with the highest quality have been published in developed countries especially in universities with high rank in world. Had they not had these equipment, they could not have published these articles. It is clear that high-ranked universities pay a lot of attention to do research and quality of education and spend a noticeable amount of money on that. So their laboratories are provided with all the best equipment they need. This is a vivid example that in order to reach to high quality of education, universities should be well-equipped.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that quality of education highly depends on methods are employed for teaching. As education consists of two parts which are teaching and learning, improving the quality of education can be achieved by improving teaching methods which can help students’ learning. Recently I read an article in a major newspaper which pointed out that students should be persuaded to carry on research by teachers. In that article it had been explained that if the quality of methods of teaching is uplifted, more students will be encouraged to do research. Hence, the quality of education will be upgraded. One way to improve the quality of teaching is getting students involved in ongoing research as an assignment in the classes. The other way and what teachers do in Harvard University is combining theoretical and practical courses in which students can learn lessons better.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that increasing teacher’s salary is neither the only way nor the best way to boost education quality. Other factors such as students’ passion and interest, equipment and methods which are selected to use, can be as important as teachers’ salary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... a country, and they should be praised. However improving the quality of education reli...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the articles') or simply say ''most articles''.
Suggestion: most of the articles; most articles
...be improved. Statistics have shown that most of articles with the highest quality have been publ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2229.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14780600462 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9408163333 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459584295612 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3863612095 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.315789474 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7894736842 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10526315789 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322797647656 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110386854106 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758250486379 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211777630627 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039512671011 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.