Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Needless to say, one of the most important things for all people, because of its impact on all aspects of individuals' lives, is traveling. Therefore, all people have always been trying to have best travel in order to have enjoyable moments. In this regard, some people believes that in order to have suitable travel we have to travel in a group which led by the tour guide. I agree with this statement and I will discuss my reasons in the following paragraphs.
Some individuals believe that tour guides should not led our group during travel, since they are strange and group's members are not comfortable with them. Such people wrongly believe that individuals usually travel with their friends and family members who they know each other very good and they have deep relationships with each other, hence they can do all things which they want during travel, but when the group led by other individual as tour guide they do not know him/her, hence they cannot be comfortable in the traveling; consequently, they will not enjoy their travel. Therefore, these people have posed that individuals should not have tour guide during travel. In contrast, I disagree with this argument, because tour guides usually are social and friendly individuals who can make deep relationships with other people very easily. You can take my cousin as the best example for this case. He works as tour guide and since he started his job he has found many friends among people who they guide during different travels. Thus, tour guides are not barrier to have enjoyable travel.
Tour guides can help individuals to spend less money during travel. This topic has been discussed by several sociologists and the majority of them believe that when passengers travel to new places, they usually do not familiar with these places, hence they have to pay much money to rent taxi in order to find places which they want to visit and taxi drivers usually receive more money from strange passengers, while tour guides usually know all things about a country or city which passengers like to visit, hence passengers spend less money. I agree with this argument, because tour guides usually are local people which know some attractive places which passengers do not hear about them, while they can have enjoyable moment in this places. By way of illustration, I can refer to some statistics which have been published by many international organizations. Based on these statistics, all passengers who had tour guides during their travels, they spent less money than other passengers. Thus, tour guides can help passengers to reduce their expenses.
In brief, as I discussed in the previous paragraphs, some people believe that it is better to travel via a group which led by tour guide. I argued that this approach is correct for a couple of reasons. First, tour guides are social and friendly individuals who can make deep relationships with other group members easily, second tour guides help passengers to spend less money during travel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...als believe that tour guides should not led our group during travel, since they are...
^^^
Line 4, column 733, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...while they can have enjoyable moment in this places. By way of illustration, I can r...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in brief, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2512.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98412698413 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48375929121 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.39880952381 0.524837075471 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.0 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.71963944 48.9658058833 222% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 125.6 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206647640091 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845813627853 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595404745201 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150977589967 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390339945732 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.