Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Traveling is one of the most productive methods that people use to become more relaxed, and their level of anxiety lessens. Group trips have their advantages, and the person who guides the passengers, tour guide, can help others enjoy an impeccable journey. Though some people prefer to travel individually without other people, others tend to participate in group trips, led by a tour leader. I believe that traveling by this method is fantastic, and I have two main reasons to support my notion.
First, communal trips incorporated by a tour leader are usually more fun and comforting than other types of journeys. People involving in these groups can take their own time and enjoy the trip by doing the things they like to do. They do not have to worry about issues that may emerge in the trip, and are not responsible for preparing food, looking for hotels, talking to officials, financing the tickets or other purchases, etc. All the mentioned tasks are assigned to the tour guide who should take care of such matters. For example, i went on a trip to Chorat Lake two years ago, and I was accompanied by a group of students, in which the tour leader, name Mehrdad, was carrying all the burden of the trip on his shoulders. It was one of my best traveling experiences; cause I did not have to cook lunch, gather wood for the fireplace, carrying tents or other pieces of equipment, and Mehrdad did all of the jobs. His contributions allowed me to play games with other passengers, engage in social activities, etc. That was one of the best trips I have ever gone to, and it could not have been the same if Mehrdad was not there for us.
Second, on a group trip, people can learn many tasks from the tour guide responsible for the trip. Group tour guides are usually certified individuals who have trained a lot, and they have gathered an immense experience by conducting trips and adventures. For instance, Mehrdad, whom I mentioned before, was a sophisticated tour guide with lots of expertise and skills regarding camping trips in nature. At the night of the journey, he initiated cutting down the woods he had gathered by an ax. I had not used an ax before that night, so I asked him for exploiting the ax, and he permitted me and taught me how to properly use an ax or what is the best way to chop the woods. I learned other skills on that trip, which I owe my current knowledge to Mehrdad for teaching me critical traveling techniques. Participating in such communal trips is a perfect way for people to learn new skills, abilities, etc.
Finally, travelers can enjoy their time in a trip companied by a tour leader more than they can ever achieve such comfort in other types of adventures. Individual trips are usually risky, and the passenger should take care of all his actions or holds responsibility for his mistakes. Traveling in groups is more fun, more relaxing, more beneficial by learning from other people's experiences, especially tour guides. Consequently, I am of the opinion that one should travel in order to learn new things and to enjoy his time. The mentioned factors are easily accessible in group travelings, accompanied by tour guides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...the most productive methods that people use to become more relaxed, and their level...
^^^
Line 2, column 538, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...take care of such matters. For example, i went on a trip to Chorat Lake two years...
^
Line 2, column 902, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...er pieces of equipment, and Mehrdad did all of the jobs. His contributions allowed me to p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, if, look, may, regarding, second, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2616.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 554.0 407.700716846 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72202166065 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66296574674 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469314079422 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 813.6 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4268479918 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167569299763 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559490677371 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311865338592 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1187475024 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326595395672 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.