Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Drivers should pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is heavy traffic.
Todays, because of modernization and growing population, demanding of using own cars has been increasing among people who live in big cities. I have been living in a busy city which has crowded streets most of the time. I agree with this statement because in my point of view, this issue can increase day by day, and it rises air pollution too. this essay is going to explain these two reasons.
First, today most people prefer using their own car, even in rush hours because of convenience and privacy. In addition, most of them go out just for spending their time or going to shopping malls. In this case, some people who commute, get stuck in traffic which is created by free people. if the government creates new policy to get a fee from drivers in harsh hours, most drivers who do not have emergency work will avoid paying fee just for driving, so they will stay at home. In this situation, commuters or students can arrive at their job or their school on-time. In my view, this policy can help to control traffic very well. I am unemployed, so whenever I need to go out to buy something, I prefer going at the middle of the day because I know in this time most people are working, and in streets there is not any traffic jammed.
Second, the issue of air pollution is a matter of importance to every society which most governments are trying to solve this problem. In my opinion, if drivers have freedom to go out every time that they want, the air pollution will be increase day by day. The government can solve this problem with getting fee from drivers in big cities which have traffic. As a result, most people prefer staying at home, or prefer using public transportation if they have emergency task. Recently, the price of buying cars has decreased, so nearly all people have own car. Unfortunately, I see a lot of cars with just a driver. if people forced to pay fee, they would not use their cars only for themselves.
Although some people do not care about heavy traffic in streets, and go out when there is a traffic jammed in streets. I firmly believe that it requires to pay fee for drivers to help solving problems of traffic and air pollution in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...by day, and it rises air pollution too. this essay is going to explain these two rea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...raffic which is created by free people. if the government creates new policy to ge...
^^
Line 5, column 617, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...I see a lot of cars with just a driver. if people forced to pay fee, they would no...
^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'paying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: paying
...eets. I firmly believe that it requires to pay fee for drivers to help solving problem...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to solve' or 'solve'.
Suggestion: to solve; solve
...requires to pay fee for drivers to help solving problems of traffic and air pollution i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, well, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52272727273 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41260226283 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489898989899 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9549419201 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.55 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190836817764 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630897365759 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649100854838 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139307509457 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596671625455 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.