Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside of the school.
Throughout history, teachers have always tried to find the best method to make students enthusiastic about their lessons. In this regard, some people believe that teachers should focus on their facilities which are available in schools, while I have enough reasons to counter this viewpoint. I will enlarge on my explanations in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, students always tend to understand practical things better than abstract one since they can experience them. So, if teachers concentrate on subjects which can help students live better outside of schools, students become more interested in learning their lessons. To put it in a more vivid picture, learning lessons by describing how students can use them in their lives can be a great motivation for them to put their heart in those lessons. In addition, it can give students a sense of satisfaction since they can do a number of works in their real lives. Take students who are taught to repair a radio to understand how they should use some tools. They can revive their radios by using tools in their homes, which give them a sense of being useful in front of their families. As a result, using practical things to teach students is the best way that teachers can use to motivate them.
Secondly, students are not that interested on schools since most of them should get up earlier in order to go there, therefore, it will be better, should teachers use subjects out of schools to teach them. This is especially true of using different kinds of plays to educate students because they can make a connection between their lessons and plays. Consequently, they try really hard to use their knowledge while they are playing, which will lead to better understanding. My experience is a compelling example of that. My physics teacher taught us how we can use gravity to be successful in plays with our toys, when our lessons were about that. As a result, I tried very hard to find how I should use it to make a success in our plays. That experience was a pleasure one to me, which resulted in better figuring out that matter. Thereby, using joyful things to teach students, can be a helpful method to motivate them figure it out better.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that using subjects which give rise to better living outside school can be a great incentive for students to make them more interested in their lessons, given the fact that, not only can student learn practical things better than imaginative ones, but also they can be more motivated when teachers use plays or other delightful things to teach them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 936, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...l method to motivate them figure it out better. To sum up, all things considered, I f...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82405345212 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57662470031 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452115812918 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4866976047 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6315789474 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297053334679 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103989700162 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980634318737 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196432167211 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629148751063 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.