Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can cast doubt on the fact that academic knowledge play a vital role in all people's life, so they try to be specialized in different subjects in order to be a more impressive person. Some people have the view that having broad knowledge of many academic subjects is better for an individuals. However, others may hold an opposite viewpoint and believe that being specialized in a certain subject is more beneficial. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that it is better for ones to be expert in one subjet. To support thiss, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following.
First and fore most, the most prominent reason which comes to my mind is that gaining knowledge in any academic subjects is very demanding and ones should spend a significant part of their time to become specialized in that certain subject. Needless to say, due to the complexitiees of modern era, nost people are suffering from timing issue and they have hectic daily schedules, so they cannot dedicate an inordinate amount of their time on learning different academic knowledge. However, they can be specialized in one subjects and also capable to get all others of their tasks done. For example, I am a secod-year student at university, I also work as a senior manager in a company in order to pay my tution fees an life costs. I do not much time to broaden my knowledge in different academic subjects, and instead of having a superficial knowledge about different subjects due to my limited time, I preferr to be specialized in just one.
Another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that all academic knowledge are not related to each other, and when ones decide to be an expert in their field, he rarely will be required to have knowledge in detailed about other subjects. As a result in order to be a successfull person in one subject one should spend a significant parrt of their time and energy on that subjects. Having broaden knowledge in different academic subject not only cannot be beneficial for one in a certain major, but also can be cosidered as waste of time which can be spent on learning all details of that certain subject and becomeing a more professional person in life. The more one is professional in a ceratsin subject, the more is reliable for a better job position. As a an illustration, take the example of two of my friends who started their academic education at a same time, the first one spent her whole time in learning all aspects of the austronomy and at last she is one of the member of NASA, the other ones tried to be specialized in different subjects and till know he has not any considerable job position regardless of his wide knowledge in different fields.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that being specialized in one academic subject is a more prudent course of action. The fact that time is limited and ones will not be able to gain detailed knowledge in many subjects through living in this hectic modern life, coupled with the benefits of being expert in one subject in their future professional life, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...of many academic subjects is better for an individuals. However, others may hold an opposite v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt and believe that being specialized in a certain subject is more beneficial. Wh...
^^
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and fore most, the most prominent reason which comes to my mind is that gaining k...
^^
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to my mind is that gaining knowledge in any academic subjects is very demanding ...
^^
Line 2, column 718, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... company in order to pay my tution fees an life costs. I do not much time to broa...
^^
Line 2, column 725, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y in order to pay my tution fees an life costs. I do not much time to broaden my ...
^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put between 'will' and 'be'.
Suggestion: will rarely be
...cide to be an expert in their field, he rarely will be required to have knowledge in detailed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 773, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... reliable for a better job position. As a an illustration, take the example of tw...
^
Line 3, column 773, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: a; an
... reliable for a better job position. As a an illustration, take the example of two o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, for example, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 15.1003584229 232% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2622.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 560.0 407.700716846 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68214285714 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.8645985582 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72080045245 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421428571429 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 857.7 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.118958401 48.9658058833 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.235294118 100.406767564 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.9411764706 20.6045352989 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256272583707 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114041986998 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629237630511 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19887645504 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018518963411 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.