Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Students do research in many ways and through a wide range resources. While some of them used to rely on online information, others just use printed datas. I, personally, agree to second group and elaborate my viewpoint as following paragraphes.
To start with, online resource like wikipedia can be edited by anyone, which is not necassarily an knowledgable or academic person. Thus, it can lead the avaialbe datas not to be reliable an scientific any more. What's more, there are some evidences show that each day some people might hack the online databases for inserting some incorrect fact to have fun. My personal experience is a compelling example in this case. When I was gathering resources for my master thesis I was forces to finish this task in a period as short as a month. I based my research on easy accessible online papers rather than scholarly books. After defence meeting, a couple of reviewer gave me a low score because they recognized that some data was not right and accurate. Also, they advised me not to rely completely on unknown writers found in the internet.
Moreover, sometimes getting information from websites are time-consuming and worthless. Unlike the books, online articles are short-length and full of advertisment and photos that is likely to distract you. In contrast, printed resources mostly just include relevant descriptive pictures that add up to your knowledge. Further, it is a good opportunity to further studying about topics that the section of index and biblography has provided. I usually check this parts after the main pages to find extra guidances and had found it valuable in many cases.
In sum, printed resources definitely is better than online websites, because are more reliable and academic and have a rich content as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ted by anyone, which is not necassarily an knowledgable or academic person. Thus, ...
^^
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d the avaialbe datas not to be reliable an scientific any more. Whats more, there ...
^^
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... to be reliable an scientific any more. Whats more, there are some evidences show tha...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 485, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'finishing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: finishing
...urces for my master thesis I was forces to finish this task in a period as short as a mon...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, as for, in contrast, in many cases, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 295.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06101694915 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77742779244 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657627118644 0.524837075471 125% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1811430519 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.8235294118 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140625604321 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391631708628 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486697532097 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951732415061 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780683859584 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.