Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Books are a very important part of our lives. It is where we find all the human’s knowledge translated into words. We can find all types of information, from history to complex theories about the universe. Some people would belive that is better to use printed material to do research; others would prefer to use internet. In my view, physical books and articles are much better for two important reasons.
The main reason is that the archive of printed material is bigger than the internet. In order to find very specific books, such as ancient or rare books, we need to look in a library. Even if we find those books in an online website, a lot of time they are just poor scanning with very low quality. In those words, searching printed material could be far more easy. For example, when I was in college, my aerodynamics professor used a very old book printed in 1930s. Me and my friends tried to find this book on the internet. We searched for about an entire day and founded just small quotations and very low quality pictures. On the next day, we went to the library and, in about five minutes, we found three copies available. Also, we discovered others interesting books in the same section that helped a lot in our studies. After that, I started to use the library every time I need to find academic books. As you can see, using printed material could more easy than the internet.
Another reason is that is easier to study with printed books. Many people have problems to stay in front of a screen for long hours, the light start to tire our eyes and after two or three hours it is almost impossible to read any text in a screen. Also, some people like to read in their smartphones, which long exposures could be is very dangerous for our vision. For instance, I remember when I was writing a paper about airplanes’ structures. My advisor sent to me a very large presentation with four hundred slides. After a time studying the material, I had a strong headache and I stopped working. On the next day, I tried again with a less bright screen, but after one hour the pain started again. The solution was to print all the material on my school and the reading become better. I remember that I could read the printed presentation for about three hours straight without any problem. This experience taught me that words in a paper are better then digital ones.
In sum, though some may prefer using the internet, printed material have a lot of advantages. Not only the collection of printed books is bigger than the virtual, but also is more comfortable to do your research reading from paper. Everyone should work to introduce more printed material in their lives to see all benefits that it have.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1930s'.
Suggestion: in the 1930s
... professor used a very old book printed in 1930s. Me and my friends tried to find this b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 955, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'better than'?
Suggestion: better than
...nce taught me that words in a paper are better then digital ones. In sum, though some may ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 962, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ght me that words in a paper are better then digital ones. In sum, though some may ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 486.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59465020576 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47631073449 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493827160494 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.9 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1910569192 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.0 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7586206897 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.06896551724 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264455807916 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731080632291 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867531983024 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180317507462 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692039926941 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.